|
Note
on Environmental Aspects of the
Sethusamudram
Ship Channel Project (SSCP)
|
PMO
Note |
|
1.
Subsequent
to the Tsunami calamity, certain urgent technical issues
have arisen regarding the SSCP which have been noted
with alarm in responsible sections of the scientific
community of the country |
|
Tuticorin
Port Trust Observations |
|
PMO
Note is the summary of an article titled " Pre- and
Post Tsunami – Is the Sethusamudram Shipping Canal
Project Technically feasible ? " which appeared in
the Economic and Political weekly dated January -22,
2005.
The
article is contributed by Dr. R. Ramesh, M.B., B.S., who
is
a medical professional. His expertise in the
complex phenomenon of Tsunami
and its impact
is debatable.
His readings on the subject of tsunami and the
project region are limited as evident from the
references cited by him.
There
have not been any observations made by any
scientist on the basis of scientific evidence
except for some statements in the media
attributed to Dr. Ted Murty, NRI Scientist about the
need for reorientation of the channel entrance in the
Bay of Bengal. This is dealt with separately.
Top
|
|
PMO
Note
|
|
2.
The
Tsunami waves which were generated on December 26, 2004
by an earthquake of 9 Richter magnitude off the west
coast of north Sumatra traveled westwards and eastwards.
The eastern wave was blocked by the Thai,
Malaysian and Indonesian landmasses.
A portion of the undissipated energy of this
eastern wave was transferred to the western wave front
traveling towards Sri Lanka and the Indian east Coast.
|
|
Tuticorin
Port Trust Observations |
|
Yes.
This
is also supported by animation models generated in India
and also outside.
Top
|
|
PMO
Note
|
|
3.
Before
touching Sri Lanka, the tsunami was traveling westward.
When it struck Sri Lanka and the east coast
of India, a clock wise
wind was created with the Palk Bay as it hub.
Had the Sethusamudram Shipping Canal been
operational at the time of this tsunami, the currents
in the Palk Bay and the associated turbulence would
have damaged the canal considerably and would have
caused a wide disposal of the dredged material placed
at sea.
|
|
Tuticorin
Port Trust Observations |
|
A
slide from an animation model by M/s. Indomer Coastal
Hydraulic (P) Ltd., Chennai in association with M/s.
Alkyon Hydraulic Consultancy and Research by the
Netherlands is enclosed (slide 1) .
This clearly establishes
that Palk Bay and Palk strait were comparatively
free from the turbulence caused by the Tsunami in the
Bay of Bengal and Indian Ocean. This slide is also
supported by the animation model of the National
Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology
, Japan
(Slide 2)
In
the case of tsunami, significant damages have been and
will be seen only along the near shore beach areas
because of resistance
of near shore structures against the Tsunami
passage. The
very location of the Sethusamudram channel far away from
the Indian or Sri Lankan coast pre-empts this
possibility.
Scientists
have also expressed the view that the channel situated
in mid sea can not show any resistance displayed by near
shore structures except for the possibility of bed
scouring which
may have the impact of increasing the depth of the
channel as witnessed in Chennai Port.
Tuticorin
Port, situated in the Gulf of Mannar and very close to
the project region, did not experience any significant
change in the bathymetry due to tsunami's impact.
If
a clockwise swirl had indeed been created in the region
with the Palk Bay as its hub ( as stated in the note but
not supported by the animation models), such clockwise
swirl would have taken the dredged materials placed at
sea, proposed to be dumped in depths of about 20-30 M in
the Bay of Bengal away from Palk Strait.
A quantity of around 34.5 million M3
of dredged materials is proposed to be
dumped in an area of about 25 Sq.KM, which will raise
the sea-bed by an average of 1.4 M only. The clockwise swirl would have carried this deep into the Bay
of Bengal, redistributing it over a very wide area
making the impact of such redistribution, even if it
would have taken place, insignificant in view of the
wide area over which it would be redistributed and
greater depths available North and Northeast
of the proposed dumping location in Bay of Bengal
Therefore,
there is no scientific basis for the apprehension that
the shipping channel , if it were in place during
tsunami, would have been damaged by the currents
and / or associated turbulence. `Wide dispersal of the
dredged materials placed at sea' would have had
insignificant effect.
Top
|
|
PMO
Note
|
|
4.
The
SSCP is an off shore shipping canal project in the
Palk Bay. It
aims to shorten the distance navigated by ships
sailing form the west coast and bound for ports on the
east coast by avoiding circum-navigation of Sri Lanka.
On the completion of the SSCP, ships would
navigate through the Gulf of Mannar and Palk Bay and
enter the Bay of Bengal directly
|
|
Tuticorin
Port Trust Observations |
|
Yes.
|
|
PMO
Note
|
|
5.
The
total length of the canal in the Palk Bay is 152.2 Km.
This is divided into three legs – the
Southern leg in the Adam's Bridge area
which is 20 KM, the northern leg in the Palk
Strait area which is 54.2 Km and the central portion
which is 78 Km in length. Dredging would have to be done in the southern and northern
legs to dredge the shallow sea bed of the Palk Bay and
Adam's Bridge to a depth of 12 metres in order to make
navigation possible. The central leg does not require dredging as it lies the
adequate depth of 12 metres.
|
|
Tuticorin
Port Trust Observations |
|
The
statistics furnished in the Note are based on the
Techno-Economic Feasibility Report prepared by the
National Environmental Engineering Research Institute,
Nagpur in July 2004. The Detailed Project Report since submitted to the Ministry
of Shipping, RT & H, has suggested some minor
changes in the channel alignment on navigational
considerations. The length of the proposed channel now
is 167.57 Km , with the southern leg at Adam's Bridge
area having a length of 34.92 Km, the northern leg in
Palk strait 54.33 Km, and the intervening stretches of
Palk Bay, not requiring any dredging, having a length of
78.32 Km
Top
|
|
PMO
Note
|
|
6.
This
is the first effort by the India to dredge a
navigation channel, which is located 30-40 Kms off
shore. It
is also the longest sea bed dredging project
undertaken by India.
|
|
Tuticorin
Port Trust Observations |
|
Yes.
|
|
PMO Note
|
|
7.
The
problems that will be faced by SSCP are expected to be
(i) problems due to sedimentation
(ii) problems due to tropical cyclonic disturbances and
(iii) issues related to dumping of the dredged materials
|
|
Tuticorin
Port Trust Observations |
|
Significant
issues relating to the SSCP, which has a major dredging
component, are :-
i.Sedimentation
in the Channel which will determine the stability of the
channel and maintenance dredging.
ii.Identification
of dumping locations for dredged materials disposal with
the objectives of -
a)minimising
environmental impact to manageable levels and
b)ensuring
that the dumped spoils do not re-enter the dredged
channel.
Though the National
environmental Engineering Research Institute had
scientifically identified the dumping areas supported by
modelling studies, further modelling studies were
carried out by Tuticorin Port Trust during September
2004 – January 2005 with involvement of Alkyon
Hydraulic Consultancy and Research bv the Netherlands
for validation and verification of NEERI's findings, and
for optimisation of distance to dumping locations.
While validating NEERI's findings
the studies have indicated the possibility of opitimising the lead
distance. However,
considering the environmental sensitivity of the project
region, it has been decided to retain the dumping
locations suggested by NEERI.
Top
|
|
PMO Note
|
|
8.
In
order to tackle these problems, detailed information and knowledge needs
to be gathered regarding sedimentation and cyclone disturbances in the
Palk Bay
|
|
Tuticorin
Port Trust Observations |
|
Tuticorin
Port Trust has carried out detailed wave modeling
studies, tide and current circulation modeling studies,
nautical studies and sedimentation modeling studies inter-alia
analysing in-depth the sedimentation regime along the
entire channel length.
As regards
tropical cyclonic disturbances, " information on
the normal wave conditions is required for further
studies on sedimentation and erosion and to establish
the limiting conditions for navigation through the
channel. Information on the extreme wave conditions is
required for the design of various structures, like
groynes and bank protection," (Report of Indomer
Coastal Hydraulics (P) Ltd., Chennai on Hydradynamic
modeling and ship Maneuvering studies for the SSCP).
Wave modeling studies of international standards,
involving an internationally acclaimed organisation,
have been carried out to meet these requirements.
The
following findings
of the modeling studies are relevant vis-a-vis
sedimentation in the channel in Palk Bay / Palk Strait
which the Note primarily deals with-
"Based on the
computed sediment
transports, it
can be concluded that the incoming sediment volume
(23,100 m3 )
is of the same order
of magnitude as the transported sediment along
the channel (32,500
m3).
This would imply the following -
•At the shallow zone of Palk Strait, the
channel depth will remain constant at CD (-) 12m (the
incoming sediment volume from long shore transport
approximately equals the outgoing sediment volume due to
transports parallel to the ship channel). This implies
that no maintenance dredging is required along this
channel section (at Palk Strait).
•East and west of shallow zone, however, the transported sediment volume
will deposit due to reduced sediment transport
capacities. The
deposited sediment volume equals to 32,500 m3/y."
The
relevance of the findings
is two-fold:
(i)
Detailed field
investigations/ modelling studies
have been carried out
in the project region.
(ii)
There will be
very little
sedimentation in the channel in
Palk Strait, compared to other approach channels
in the country.
The
general philosophy followed
worldwide in designing an off shore
structure is that predictions about the ocean
environment have to be made first,
ideally based
on the history of the environment for
'hundreds of years of
data' (A.K.Malhotra – "Ocean Science and
Technology" p 32, 1980)". "In actual fact, the data for a particular
location usually cover
a much shorter period and, therefore,
are a poor basis for predicting the future from
the oceanographer – statistician's point
of view.
Despite this, valid operating
and design values can be obtained by one of
several methods" (A.K.Malhotra).
This is
normally done through predictive
modelling, as carried out by Tuticorin Port for
SSCP.
The issues relating to
cyclonical disturbances are discussed in Section 12.
Top
|
|
PMO Note
|
|
9.
Palk
Bay is one of the major permanent sediment sinks of India. In a study
entitled " Littoral Drift Sources and Sinks along the Indian
Coastal by Chandramohan and others in 2001, the sea depth reduction due to
sedimentation in the Palk Bay has
been estimated to be 1 cm per year Marine and riverine sources contribute
to these sediments. In a
publication entitled " Rapid Land Building Activity along Vedaranyam
Coast and its Possible
Implications" brought out by Ramasamy and others in 1998, the
sediment building activities due to sea currents in the
Vedanarayanam-Jaffna peninsular stretch of Palk Bay has been estimated to
be 29 metres per year. Similarly
in another study on the Sethusamudram Canal published by Rajamanickem in
2004, the sedimentation rate has been estimated to be 24 cms per year in
the Manamelkudi area of Palk Bay
|
|
Tuticorin
Port Trust Observations |
|
The
Note refers to findings reproduced in some research
papers which are based on micro-regional studies or
application of mathematical formulae.
The study of
Rajamanickam has
been mentioned. Rajamanickam says in his paper – "Sethusamudram
Canal: The
life line of Tamilnadu" (National Seminar
on Ecological
balance and Sethusamudram Canal, 1-3rd October,
2004, Department
of Oceanography and Coastal Area Studies, Alagappa
University), that "it is interesting to see that
the maritime surveys
conducted between 1960 and 1986 reveal the change
of contour to the tune of 6m shallowness in the Palk
Strait.
That shows that around 24 cm per year is being silted off in
the Strait."
The Note only
quotes this
part of his observation
but fails to add that he has actively
supported the construction of the navigation channel to
remedy his natural phenomenon. In
his paper, Rajamanickam visualizes
"the merger of this two
(spit from Thalaimannar side in Sri Lanka and
spit from Manalmelkudi
in India) within the next 50 years.
Once these spits
join, the Palk Strait
will become into two lagoon of the north and south.
The flushing of waters from Gulf
of Mannar to
Bay of
Bengal will
be stopped". He
has further
opined -"Because
of such ocean circulation, Tamil Nadu is getting
monsoonal rainfall.
The day
siltation initiated, one must have observed the drifting
of cyclones and low depressions to Nellore and Orissa.
Slowly the quantum of rainfall in Tamil Nadu and
the order of cyclones in delta region have been in the
decreasing order. If
the flushing is completely stopped, the monsoonal winds
and ocean circulations may not be directed through this
Strait. If
such action takes place, Tamil Nadu may not get proper
rainfall and subsequently the granary of rice, the
Cauvery deltas will become a desert by the turn of this
century.
The moment, Sethusamudram
Canal is brought in force, that Canal may become the
draining canal first for all the silts dumped
along the
coast of Palk in
the past. There is every
possibility to retrieve back the clear water and
comparatively deeper
shelf in many
areas. Such
increase of
depth and clarity of water may enable the delicious fish
varieties to
get more populated and fishermen in this region can do
the fishing right in front
of the hamlets as in the case of 19th
century. The per capita income of the fishing community of
nearly 40,000 people may go up many times.
The delta region may get
good rainfall and may plan to go for cultivation
without the dependence of Mettur
water. In the beginning, the Sethusamudram Canal may face
frequent dredging due to the sliding of the silts dumped
earlier. In
few years this
will be settled.
The fear complex
developed among the fishing community
is baseless. Instead of
loosing their
fishing and
trawling, they
will get more catch due to the
International navigation as in the case of
Panama.
Therefore, scientific evidence is being cited against the project when the
scientist who has produced such evidence
goes on to say in the same research paper that
the scientific
evidence leads him to believe that an
environmental and ecological disaster is waiting to
happen unless the Sethusamudram Ship Channel is urgently
created to provide a draining canal for the silt in Palk
Bay/Palk Strait.
For a dredging project involving creation
of a navigation channel,
sedimentation in the project setting and in the
channel as a result of sedimentation regime in the area
need to be studied.
In the case of SSCP,, sedimentation transport
rate along the channel
and long shore sediment transport across the
channel need estimation for computation of annual
maintenance dredging requirements.
Such estimation
has been done in the past (earlier studies)
through modelling and
radio-active
tracer analysis.
Tuticorin Port Trust has carried out
sedimentation modelling in the project area involving a
world-renowned organisation which has clearly
established that sedimentation transport rate along and
across the channel is insignificant.
Top
|
|
PMO Note
|
|
10.
Those
findings indicate that there are specific regions in Palk Bay where the
annual sea depth deduction is 25-75 times higher than the average value
proposed by Chandramohan etc. for the entire Bay.
The two legs of the SSCP where dredging is required happen to cross
two such micro regions with high sedimentation rates.
|
|
Tuticorin
Port Trust Observations |
|
The
legs of the SSCP where dredging will take place pass
through two micro regions with high sedimentation rates
– Adam's Bridge and Palk Strait.
This prompted Tuticorin Port Trust to commission
further modeling
studies to verify and validate NEERI's findings.
The modeling
studies have led to reliable
estimation of sediment transportation rate along
and across the channel in these regions.
Top
|
|
PMO Note
|
|
11.
The
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for Sethusamudram Shipping Canal
Project carried out by the National Environmental Engineering Research
Institute (NEERI) has not taken into account the sediment contribution
from the rivers flowing into Palk Bay.
This study does not pinpoint the sediment source for about 99.4 %
of the total sedimentation volume.
|
|
Tuticorin
Port Trust Observations |
|
While undertaking the EIA Study NEERI
have generated primary data
in addition to relying upon secondary data.
Primary data has also been used by them for
validation of Secondary data. They had also carried out
mathematical/ simulation studies.
Tuticorin Port Trust, in its endeavour to verify
and validate NEERI's findings,
had commissioned further modelling/ simulation
studies.
P.Chandramohan
et al (Littoral drifts sources
and sinks along the Indian Coast, Current Science, Vol.81, No.3, 10
August 2001) in their study had
estimated 0.3 x 1010 m3 sediment
deposition in Palk Bay region, in an area of 117
km x 105 km
over a period of 51 years.
M/s.Indomer Coastal Hydraulics
(P) Ltd. (of which Dr.P.Chandramohan is the
Managing Director) have estimated sediment
deposit of
32, 500 m3/y
in Palk Strait part of SSCP, which will have
a length of 54 kms. A comparison of the estimates
is shown below:
1.Sedimentation
capacity in the channel,
proportionate to estimate to
Chandramohan et at
.
54x0.3x1010
= 77,569 m3
117x105x51
2.Sedimentation computed by
TPT modelling study
Along the channel-
Incoming sediment volume
=23,100 m3
Outgoing
sediment volume
=32,500 m3
Across the
channel-
Deposited sediment volume
=32,500 m3
--------------------------
Total
=88,100m3
==================
Therefore,
the findings from the modelling studies compare favourably with results of
research studies available
for the area.
The imputation that the studies do not pin-point
the sediment source for about 99.4% of the total
sedimentation volume
appears to be based on the following
(i)Total sediment
load computed:
58.8 x 106m3
by Chandramohan
et al for entire Palk Bay
(117 x105 sq.km.)
(ii)Less
net annual sediment
transport :
0.2657 x 106m3
Computed by NEERI
for Adam's Bridge area
(which has a length
of 17 kms)
(iii)
Less estimation made by
Sanil Kumar et al for net
littoral sediment
transportation:
0.095 x 106 m3 into
Palk Bay from Nagapattinam
coast.
Unaccounted,
according to
the Note
58.4393 x 106m3
The
primary source of the sediments deposited on the beaches
is the weathering of the land; the sediments are
then transported
through rivers to the
ocean' (Chandramohan et al, 2001).
It is also
estimated that 'The quantities
of materials contributed
by head land erosion
and aeolian transport are both less than 2 per
cent of river transport' (Chandramohan et al, 2001).
Therefore, when the
sedimentation due
to littoral drift from the north (Nagapattinam)
estimated by Sanil Kumar et al (2002) and the total
sedimentation load for Palk Bay region computed
by Chandramohan
et al (2001 – Sanil Kumar
was also part
of this research group)
are accepted as valid, the source of the difference is
very clear-sediment contribution from the rivers.
This is supported by the following excerpts- `Vaigai,
Vaishali and Valryar rivers are the major sediment
sources entering the palk bay region'. (Malik, T.C.,
Indian Journal of Marine Science, 1983-12,203-208).
`Large amounts of sediments from the pediments are
removed constantly by rainfall and carried by minor
rivers and dumped into the Palk bay'.(Loveson et al, Sea
Level Variation and its impact on Coastal Environment,
ed Rajamanickam, 1990, PP159-178).
The studies carried
out by the Project authorities
are for
the purpose
of delineating the
project setting in order
to identify the environmental consequences of the
proposed project, assess
their impact, evaluate
the environmental viability of the project and devise an
Environmental Management Plan to
minimise the environmental impacts.
The findings
of these studies are substantiated
and supported by research studies of the region
in which the project is situated.
Top
|
|
PMO Note
|
|
12.
Out
of the 61 cyclones that have crossed the Tamilnadu coast in the period
1891-1995, 6 have directly crossed the Palk Bay.
The Met Department
considers the coastal stretch between Nagapattinam and Pamban as a
high risk zone for tropical cyclones.
A study entitled " Identification of Costs Vulnerable for
Severe Tropical Cyclones – Statistical Evaluation" published in
2004 has named this coastal stretch as the most vulnerable to severe
tropical cyclones among the many coastal regions of the Bay of Bengal.
Studies on the pattern of movement of sediments during the cyclonic
storms are not available at present.
However, it is known that these storms have a tendency to transport
sediments into Palk Bay from the Nagapattinam coast and from Gulf of
Mannar
|
|
Tuticorin
Port Trust Observations |
|
'The most damaging oceanographic
episode that coastal residents can face is a cyclone
with a combination of wind, waves, surge and rain'
(Antonio Mascarenhas, Current Science, Vol.86, No.3, 10
February 2004). An important prerequisite for
sustainable development,
therefore, is resilience towards natural hazards and
elimination of disasters.
In terms
of landfall, among the severe cyclones over a
century, according to Mascarenhas, '55 crossed
the coast of Tamilnadu, 69 hit Andhra Pradesh, 58
affected Orissa,
33 struck West Bengal.'
Impacts of tropical
cyclones have been and continue to be the
most disruptive recurring events for the east
coast of India.
From available records, Mascarenhas concludes -
(i)
Andhra Coast is the most vulnerable to several
tropical cyclones.
About 32% of the cyclones forming
in the Bay of Bengal
make landfall along this coastal state every
year.
(ii) Orissa
follows with 27%, Tamilnadu with 26% and West
Bengal with 15%.
(iii) The Andhra
Coast has been subjected to storms, with a highly
significant increase in the mean frequency of severe
storms incident on Andhra Coast after 1975 as compared to earlier periods.
(iv) Orissa is
affected by the highest frequency of severe cyclones in
October and November every year, with the highest
probability (56%)
of at least one
cyclone crossing the
coast and 1% probability of four
cyclones crossing Orissa every year.
(v)
In terms of storm surges, the West Bengal coast
is highly vulnerable to attack by storm surges with
heights ranging from 2-12m.
The
coast of Orissa has
witnessed maximum surge heights of 7 m.
The Andhra Pradesh
and Tamilnadu Coasts are
vulnerable
where observed surge heights are in the range of
1 to 6 m.
(vi)
Andhra and Orissa
are the most vulnerable to coastal inundations.
To summarise his findings,
(a) In terms
of incidence of severe tropical cyclones, Andhra
and Orissa are more vulnerable than the
Tamilnadu coast.
(b) In terms
of storm surges, West Bengal and Orissa
coasts are highly vulnerable, while the Tamilnadu
Coast is vulnerable.
(c)
Andhra and Orissa are the most vulnerable
to coastal
inundations.
Therefore,
absolute figures relating to Tamilnadu Coast
need to be compared with the rest of the east
coast. The
statistics furnished
in para 11 of the Note
that `against the incidence of 61 cyclones on the
Tamilnadu coast during the period 1891-1995, only 6 had
directly crossed the Palk Bay' is also relevant in this
context as in simple arithmetical language it conveys
that the Palk Bay is less vulnerable to incidence of
cyclones than the rest of the Tamilnadu Coast.
The
Sethusamudram Ship Canal Project
was originally conceived by the British
as early as in 1860 with the objective of
providing sheltered
passage to
merchant and navy ships, sparing
them from the vagaries of nature and to provide safe
anchorage during the
tropical cyclones normally encountered off the Tamilnadu
Coast during the North East monsoon
(October – December).
The
Note cites the
incidence of cyclones in the project area as the reason
for reviewing
the need for the project when the major ports of
Visakhapatnam, Paradip and Haldia are situated in coastal areas more vulnerable to such
incidence.
So is Kakinada where a
major port facility
is coming up.
Top
|
|
PMO Note
|
|
13.
There
are two previous records of tsunami destruction in this area.
The first record is of an earthquake, | |